Respect is earned not a right.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?Where were you during the Bush years asking people not to dis the person leading the country? All I can say is, at least Bush LED something.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?We are Obamaland now. It sucks.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?were still united even though we disagree on many subjects
and how things should be run
us republicans think its okay to capitalize on sick peopleDo you think we should change our name from United States of America?You sound like a liberal- you want everyone to be the same. Well, our differences of opinion is what makes this country great. A diverse collection of people with differing ideas will always yield a more productive outcome than a group of people that are all the same, with the same views (google 'Group Think.') I think you might have liked Nazi Germany.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?Obama wants to change the name to the Socialist States of North America.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?I vote we change it to KRUNKVILLE!
And since we own Iraq, too, we can call it PARTYSTAN!Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?We should change it to %26quot;Made in China%26quot;Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?American Politics has always been a contact sport. Just play along, do what makes sense and America will some how keep limping along.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?Since we are a republic of individual states we are different as a whole but united as a group. We didn't change the name during the civil war so why now?Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?The United 57 States Of America.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?The only way the United states and the rest of the world, can get along with each other. If aliens decides to attack the earth.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?the Divided House Standing Against Itself of America
Who said %26quot;Bush is Hitler?%26quot;
Thank you.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?The unnecessary invasion of Iraq and the deceiving manipulation of information to take us in, ****** it up, and Saddam is laughing now...Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?Right wants it both ways. When Bush was in office it was all about unity, but not that their guy is not in charge they do not care about unity.Do you think we should change our name from United States of America?I'll prove all of the insane things I'm about to say at the very bottom with links to videos you can't dismiss bearing information that is all public knowledge. Understand going in to this that keeping people divided and at one another's throats has been pivotal to the success of all that which we are about to delve in to. Divisiveness serves a purpose. We truly would be united if our politicians and media didn't do such a good job of convincing us that we're not. Carrying on...
I don't think that we should change the name of our country, I know that we practically already have. If you have any doubts, look at the European Union. It was preceded by a series of GATT (general agreement on tariffs and trade) meetings culminating in free trade agreements being signed in rather shady ways with little to no public knowledge, participation, education, or consent that eventually led to the formation of what, for all intents and purposes, is a new country: The European Union.
The precise same framework of GATTs exist between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. We're going to be the North American Union. But first we had to destroy Mexico's economy, largely agricultural, by creating the Hoover Dam. This displaced millions of Mexican workers, who illegally (because they couldn't afford to do so legally) migrated to the U.S. and performed cheap labor for a bunch of white people who looked down upon them. After driving Mexico in to poverty, we had to get Canada to invest 60% of its economy in the U.S.
After that, we sent a lot of manufacturing jobs to Mexico when they became willing to do them for an insignificant fraction of what U.S. workers would. Then we replaced those those auto-manufacturing jobs in the U.S. with auto-manufacturing jobs insourced from Canada when the U.S. workers became willing to do them for a fraction of what the Canadians were doing them for. It's like a reverse application of the White Water scam, driving the wages of your job down instead of driving the prices of real estate up.
Sadly, we couldn't all be one country yet. So we had to engineer a gigantic crisis out of nowhere. It couldn't be just any sort of crisis, though - this had to be an unmistakable death knell for the U.S.
Before Canada, the U.S. and Mexico can run on the same currency they need fairly similar standards of living. So the government allowed 9/11 to happen, if they didn't directly engineer the whole event to happen - which is what stupid things like scientific examination of the evidence and listening to the eyewitness testimony proves. Consider. A month after the impact, molten metal was discovered at WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7 at temperatures of 1500 degrees F. Jet fuel burns at about a cieling of 1520 F. The only thing that could explain such a large amount of heat one month after 9/11 is the use of Thermite. Furthermore, the very few scraps of recovered molten metal that were tested by universities all discovered in every sample iron residue formation consistent with thermite use and nothing else and nothing else that was alleged to have happened. Additionally, there are the survivors from the lower basement level of the towers who were present when the bombs in the basement levels went off!
...so? The towers were demolished to destroy the U.S. economy by ruining us fiscally (13 billion+ damage to NYC, followed by two unnecessary wars), which would pull the Canadian economy down behind it and leave both countries with a quality of living and disparity between the wealthy and poor similar to Mexico, allowing us all to share one currency and more smoothly operate under one broad, centralized body of governance in which the citizenry never decide how any thing important happens. We're almost the last stage - implementation of a new Union identification system and currency. First, the U.S. and Canda have to sink a bit more. And they will, more so than most people alive now could ever suspect. Comparing U-6 unemployment stats of today to those at a comparable point in relation to the Great Depression would leave you shell shocked.
The first link will explain how scientific testing proved the towers were demolished.
The second link is an announcement, made during the Bush announcement, of the fact that you now live in the North American Union.
The third link addresses the basement explosions in an interview on Fox news with the only man who, on 9/11, had a stairwell key. He saved 15 lives then came on and told a story about a building that suffered an explosion, then got hit by a plane, then underwent more explosions, along with encounters he had with people running around screaming, %26quot;explosion!%26quot; Along the way, he describes IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS that the basement was collapsed before the towers collapsed. The planes didn't hit the freaking basement, okay? You can't hit the top or middle of a 100+ story tall structure and collapse the basement before any other part of the structure. Erego, *bombs were definitely used*. You can deny one or two parts of this, you just can't do it while there's a history book open. You could've called some of it conjecture or conspiracy theory before most of it happened. But almost all of it has already occurred, and we're left with nothing but the cover-ups.
